Grape wine chlorogenic acids offset the development of metabolic syndrome

Year & Volume - Issue: 
Authors: 
Vladimir I. Mizin, Vladimir V. Iezhov, Leyla S. Dudchenko, Nikita A. Severin, Anatolij Ya. Yalaneckyy
Article type: 
CID: 
e0409
PDF File: 
Abstract: 
Goal is to evaluate effectiveness of chlorogenic acids (CGA) of grape wines as a part of medical rehabilitation in chronic bronchitis (CB) patients with comorbid metabolic syndrome (MS). Material and Methods — Analysis of effectiveness of CGA of dry white wines “Rkatsiteli” and “Rkatsiteli Alma” and liquor red wine “Cahors” as parts of the health resort treatment was carried out in group of 182 patients with CB (42 patients with MS). Results and Conclusion — The beneficial effect of grape wine CGA was manifested in relation to dynamics of triacylglycerol, regardless of presence or absence of MS. The greatest metabolic effect of CGA was manifested in patients with MS with positive effect on dynamics of Quetelet index and cholesterol. The moderate consumption of wines rich in CGA can be recommended to patients with chronic bronchitis as a preventive measure to development of metabolic syndrome.
Cite as: 
Mizin VI, Iezhov VV, Dudchenko LS, Severin NA, Yalaneckyy AYa. Grape wine chlorogenic acids offset the development of metabolic syndrome. Russian Open Medical Journal 2021; 10: e0409.

Introduction

Chlorogenic acid (CGA) is a compound found in a wide variety of foods and beverages including fruits, vegetables, olive oil, spices, grape, grape wine and coffee [1]. CGA are mainly esters of quinic acid with caffeic, ferulic, or coumaric acids. Significant amounts of three isomers (in positions 3,4, and 5 of quinic acid) of each of these groups of caffeoylquinic, di-caffeoylquinic, and feruloylquinic acids are usually found, too [2]. CGA reduces food cravings and daily calorie intake, induces body fat loss by increasing thermogenesis as a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARa) agonist, just like statins. CGA assists the liver in processing the fatty acids and reduces hepatic triacylglycerol levels, thus resulting in weight loss [3]. CGA shows antioxidant activity against reactive oxygen species (ROS), which play an important role in the development of inflammation and lipid exchange disorders under chronic bronchitis (CB) and comorbid metabolic syndrome (MS) [4, 5, 6]. Rational argument for the inclusion of grape wine CGA in the medical rehabilitation (MR) can be its protecting and therapeutic effects.

The aim of the study is to evaluate effectiveness of chlorogenic acids (CGA) of grape wines as a part of medical rehabilitation (MR) in chronic bronchitis (CB) patients with comorbid metabolic syndrome (MS).

 

 

Material and Methods

Analysis of effectiveness of grape wine CGA as part of health resort treatment was carried out in group of 182 patients with CB (including 42 patients with MS) according to CONSORT guidelines. Institutional (Academic Scientific Research Institute of Physical Methods of Treatment, Medical Climatology and Rehabilitation n.a. I.M. Sechenov) review board approvals were obtained. The comparison of CGA effect data was carried out between four groups (see Table 1). All patients received individual health resort treatment which involves the use of all necessary medical factors and pharmaceuticals (climatic- and spa-therapy, remedial gymnastics, massage, baths, physiotherapy, supporting medication etc.). Characteristics of treatment program in all four groups were not significantly different (except for the grape wine CGA consumption). Main characteristics of table dry white wine “Rkatsiteli” (DW1) and “Rkatsiteli Alma” (DW2), produced by white (classical, for DW1) and red (Kakhetian, for DW2) technologies from white grape of Rkatsiteli variety, and liquor red wine “Cahors” (LW), produced by red (classical) technology from couple of red grape of Cabernet- Sauvignon and Saperavi varieties are: alcohol content (% by volume) is 12.7, 12.7 and 16.0 accordingly; sugar (mass concentration based on invert, g/l) is 0.0, 0.0 and 160.0 accordingly; titrated acids (mass concentration in terms of tartaric acid, g/l) is 5.7., 7.9 and 6.8 accordingly; total phenolic compounds (mass concentration, determined by a standard Folin-Ciocalteu method, mg/l) is 243.0, 1254.0 and 2080.0 accordingly; including CGA (mass concentration, determined by a standard HPLC method, mg/l) is 74.0, 32.0 and 70.0 accordingly. Reception of wine was carried out once a day in the afternoon. Daily doses in core groups were 200 ml of DW1 and DW2 (consist of 14.8 and 6.3 mg of CGA) and 100 ml of LW (consist of 7.0 mg of CGA). Course doses of DW1, DW2 and LW were 2722.4±119.2, 2406.8±174.4 and 1318.5±52.3 ml respectively, including course doses of CGA of 201.5±15,3, 76.9±7.7 and 92.2±5.1 mg respectively. The course doses of CGA in core groups 1A and 2A were 135.7±13.1 mg and 124.1±8.2 mg respectively. Methods of investigation included an assessment of functional state of the leading physiological systems by 20 domains of ICF [7, 8]. All the clinic, laboratory and functional investigations were conducted by standard procedures. The estimation of the ICF domain values was carried out according to the procedure [9]. All studies were performed twice, with fixation of the results (M±m) before and after the treatment. We also evaluated parameter value dynamics Δ as: Δ = (value at initial state of treatment) – (value at the end of treatment). The influence of wine components including CGA, total phenolic compounds (PC) and ethanol (E) was estimated by pair correlation coefficient (r) of parameter value dynamics (Δ) with course dose of the components. The statistics significance of Δ and r were estimated at p<0.05. The software used for statistical analysis is Microsoft Excel, including multiple regression analysis.

 

Table 1. The statistically significant ICF domain value dynamics (Δ) and pair correlation coefficient (r) with course doses of ethanol (E) and total phenolic compounds (PC), including CGA

ICF domains

ICF domain and other parameters value dynamics, Δ and pair correlation coefficient, r

Patients with MS

Patients without MS

Core group 1A, with wine consumption (n=24)

Control group 1B (n=18)

Core group 2A, with wine consumption (n=76)

Control group 2B (n=64)

Δ

r

Δ

Δ

r

Δ

 

b2401 Dizziness (in points)

0.25±0.12

CGA r=+0.328

E r=+0.390

0.22±0.10

&

0.32±0.06 *

§

CGA r=+0.210

PC r=+0.224

E r=+0.224

0.56±0.08 * §&

 

b28010 Pain in head and neck (in points)

0.50±0.1 *

$

CGA r=+0.328

PC r=+0.491

1.11±0.22 *

$

0.49±0.10 *

§

CGA r=+0.193

PC r=+0.239

E r=+0.239

0.53±0.11 *

§

 

 

b430 Hematological system functions (in points)

0.11±0.06

CGA r=+0.344

-0.02±0.12

0.07 ±0.04

 

0.00±0.04

 

b4301 Oxygen-carrying functions of the blood (in points)

0.09±0.06

CGA r=+0.397

E r=+0.277

0.17±0.10

0.11 ±0.04 *

 

0.03±0.04

 

b4303 Clotting functions (in points)

0.33±0.17

$ §

CGA r=+0.277

E r=+0.277

-0.92±0.27 *

$ &

-0.21±0.12

§

 

-0.13±0.18

&

 

b440 Respiration functions

(in points)

0.04±0.04

CGA r=+0.259

0.11±0.07

0.03±0.05

CGA r=+0.167

0.02±0.05

 

b455 Exercise tolerance function (in points)

0.70±0.1 *

E r=+0.284

0.60±0.08 *

0.70 ±0.07 *

PC r=+0.218

E r=+0.218

0.63±0.05 *

 

b4550 General physical endurance (in points)

0.17±0.17

CGA r=+0.417

E r=+0.417

-0.22±0.15

&

0.06±0.06

 

0.23±0.09

&

 

b4551 Aerobic capacity (in points)

0.66±0.28

E r=+0.264

0.23±0.12

 

0.77±0.18 *

§

 

0.33±0.09

§

 

b4552 Fatiguability (in points)

0.88±0.1*

PC r=+0.472

1.22±0.15 *

0.82±0.09 *

PC r=+0.171

E r=+0.171

0.95±0.08 *

 

b540 General metabolic functions (in points)

1.03±0.2 * &

CGA r=+0.569

E r=+0.485

0.79±0.16 *

§

0.08±0.06

&

 

0.02±0.06

§

 

b5403 Fat metabolism (in points)

0.60±0.22

CGA r=+0.650

E r=+0.550

0.54±0.20

0.42±0.09 *

 

0.32±0.17

 

b5408 General metabolic functions, other specified – MS (in points), including:

1.16±0.3 *

$

CGA r=+0.327

 

1.18±0.25 *

&

-0.08±0.07

$

 

0.00±0.00

&

 

Δ of Quetelet index, BMI (kg/m²)

0.32±0.13

PC r=+0.294

E r=+0.280

0.46±0.15

-0.06±0.07

 

0.73±0.57

 

Δ of cholesterol (mmol/l)

0.51±0.15

CGA r=+0.408

E r=+0.338

0.51±0.25

0.51±0.08 *

 

0.21±0.13

 

Δ of triacylglycerol (mmol/l)

0.51±0.1 * $

CGA r=+0.609

E r=+0.419

-0.16±0.20 $

0.26±0.08

CGA r=+0.387

PC r=+0.344

E r=+0.344

0.10±0.07

 

d2408 Handling stress and other physiological demands, other specified (in points)

0.53±0.25

CGA r=+0.538

PC r=+0.475

0.53±0.22

0.21±0.11

§

 

0.60±0.13 *

§

 

Complex of all controlled domains (in points)

0.50±0.0 *

&

CGA r=+0.527

E r=+0.531

0.40±0.06 *

0.25±0.03 *

§ &

CGA r=+0.230

PC r=+0.247

E r=+0.247

0.34±0.03 *

§

 

Number of beneficial effects of CGA

 

14

 

 

5

 

 

Data of Δ presented as mean value and standard deviations (M±m); r, pair correlation coefficient with course dose; ICF, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; MS, metabolic syndrome. * – statistically significant (at p<0.05) difference of values before and after treatment, i.e., significant Δ of parameter; $, &, § , statistically significant (at p<0.05) difference between the means in two groups with the same notation (between $ and $ , between & and &, between § and §); CGA, significant (at p<0.05) pair correlation coefficient with CGA course dose (mg); PC, significant (at p<0.05) pair correlation coefficient with total polyphenol compound course dose (mg); E, significant (at p<0.050) pair correlation coefficient r with ethanol course dose (ml); positive value of Δ or r indicates a beneficial effect, and vice versa.

 

Results and Discussion

The mean values of domains had the levels at initial state which have not statistically significant differences in core and control groups of patients with MS and in core and control groups of patients without MS, too. The initial values of the controlled parameters in the core groups of patients with and without MS did not have statistically significant differences, with the exception of arterial blood pressure, Quetelet index and triacylglycerol level, which are the signs of MS. The same picture was observed in the control groups of patients with and without MS. The distribution of controlled data was close to statistically normal.

The data indicate influence of ethanol and total phenolic compounds including CGA are presented in Table 1.

The medical rehabilitation of patients with CB is characterized by high efficiency for complex of all controlled domains in all 4 groups. Influence of grape wine CGA on functional state in core group 1A (patients with MS) demonstrated more beneficial effects than in core group 2A (patients without MS): 14 and 5 beneficial effects correspondingly.

First of all, the beneficial effect of grape wine CGA was manifested in relation to the dynamics of triacylglycerol, regardless of the presence or absence of MS (decrease 28.9% and 11.1% from the baseline in patients with and without MS, accordingly).

As can be seen from Table 1, two studied components – CGA and ethanol – had significant positive correlation coefficients with the dynamics of triacylglycerols in both studied groups. We carried out a factor analysis of influence of these components (see Table 2).

 

Table 2. The results of regression analysis on triacylglycerols dynamics with course doses of ethanol (E) and CGA

Parameters of multiple regression

Effect on the dynamics of triacylglycerols in group with MS (N=29)

Effect on the dynamics of triacylglycerols in group without MS (N = 91)

Course dose of CGA (Variable

X 1), in mg

Course dose of Ethanol (Variable X 2), in mg

Joint action of course doses of CGA and Ethanol

Course dose of CGA (Variable

X 1), in mg

Course dose of Ethanol (Variable

X 2), in mg

Joint action of course doses of CGA and Ethanol

R – square

0.3767

0.2986

0.3824

0.0949

0.0622

0.0995

F – value (analysis of variance)

16.3207

11.4953

8.0486

9.33016

5.8987

4.8620

Y-intersection

-0.1412

-0.1617

-0.1089

0.0621

0.0667

0.0807

Odds of Variables

X1=0.0041

X2=0.0021

X1=0.0054

X2=-0.0008

X1=0.0017

X2=0.0007

X1=0.0025

X2=-0.0004

P – values of Variables

X1=0.0004

X2=0.0022

X1=0.0717

X2=0.6301

X1=0.0030

X2=0.0171

X1=0.0593

X2=0.5034

Significance of F – value (i.e., P – value for joint action of all variables)

0.0004

0.0022

0.0019

0.0030

0.0171

0.0099

 

It was found that in both patient groups (with and without MS) the regression equations for the effect of CGA were an order of magnitude more reliable than the equations for the effect of ethanol. In both patient groups the multiple regression equations for the combined effect of CGA and ethanol were also significant but less reliable than the regression equation of influence of one single factor – CGA. Another studied component – PC – had significant positive correlation coefficient with the dynamics of triacylglycerols in patients without MC, too (see Table 1). But the regression equations for the effect of PC on the dynamics of triacylglycerols, single or together with CGA and E, were not reliable (the F – value significance exceeded 0.05) in all studied groups. The regression equations for the effect of CGA, ethanol and polyphenol compound (for single or joint action) on dynamics of Quetelet index (BMI) and cholesterol were not reliable in all studied groups, too.

The greatest metabolic effect of CGA was manifested in patients with MS who also had a positive effect on the dynamics of the Quetelet index (decrease of 1% from baseline) and cholesterol (decrease of 8.1% from baseline).

As a result, a good rehabilitation of the functional state of patients in b540 (General metabolic functions), b5403 (Fat metabolism) and b5408 (General metabolic functions, other specified – MS) domains is noted. The data is in good accordance with effect of coffee CGA consumption [3, 10, 11] and with results of clinical trials [12-15]. The data indicates the possibility of no less effective correction of lipid metabolism using grape wine rich in CGA, not only coffee alone.

The investigated effects in CB patients with MS are in good accordance to beneficial reputation of Mediterranean diet rich in grape wine.

 

Conclusion

The positive effects of grape wine CGA indicate that wines consumption is more preferable than strong alcoholic beverages, poor of CGA. The moderate consumption of wines rich in CGA can be recommended to patients with chronic bronchitis, as a preventive measure to developing metabolic syndrome. The clinical significance of these findings needs further investigation. Subsequently, our research will be aimed at studying the potential role of gallic and other grape wine acids in medical rehabilitation.

 

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

 

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References: 
  1. Veljkovic E, Xia W, Phillips B, Wong ET, Ho J, Oviedo A, et al. Chapter 10 – other compounds from tobacco with potential impact on neurodegenerative diseases. In: Nicotine and other tobacco compounds in neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases. Overview of epidemiological data on smoking and preclinical and clinical data on nicotine. Elsevier Academic Press, 2018: 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812922-7.00010-X.
  2. Caballero B, Finglas P, Toldrá F, Eds. The Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2nd Ed. San Diego, United States; London, United Kingdom: Elsevier Academic Press, 2003; 6000 p. https://www.sciencedirect.com/referencework/9780122270550/encyclopedia-of-food-sciences-and-nutrition.
  3. Gupta RC, Ed. Nutraceuticals. Efficacy, Safety and Toxicity. Elsevier Academic Press, 2016; 1040 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2014-0-01870-9.
  4. Rodriguez-Mateos A, Vauzour D, Krueger CG, Shanmuganayagam D, Reed J, Calani L, et al. Bioavailability, bioactivity and impact on health of dietary flavonoids and related compounds: an update. Arch Toxicol 2014; 88(10): 1803-1853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-014-1330-7.
  5. Rodríguez-Monforte M, Sánchez E, Barrio F, Costa B, Flores-Mateo G. Metabolic syndrome and dietary patterns: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur J Nutr 2017; 56(3): 925-927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-016-1305-y.
  6. Greenwood D, Slack R, Barer M and Irving W, Eds. Medical Microbiology. A guide to microbial infections: pathogenesis, immunity, laboratory diagnosis and control. 18th Ed. Churchill Livingstone. 2012; 794 p. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780702040894/medical-microbiology.
  7. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2001; 311 p. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42407/9241545429.pdf?sequence=1.
  8. ICF Checklist Version 2.1a, Clinician Form. World Health Organization. 2003; 15 p. https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/icfchecklist.pdf.
  9. Mizin VI, Severin NA, Dudchenko LS, Ezhov VV, Ivaschenko AS, Beliaeva SN, et al. Methodology of evaluation of rehabilitation potency and efficacy under pathology of cardio-respiratory system in accordance to international classification of functioning, disability and health. In: Topical issues of balneology, physiotherapy and medical rehabilitation. Proceedings. Vol. XXVII. Yalta: Academic Research Institute of Physical Methods of Treatment, Medical Climatology and Rehabilitation named after I.М. Sechenov. 2016; 27: 1-22. Russian. https://aniisechenova.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Сборник-трудов-АНИИ-им.И.М.Сеченова-2016.pdf.
  10. Cho AS, Jeon SM, Kim MJ, Yeo J, Seo KI, Choi MS, et al. Chlorogenic acid exhibits anti-obesity property and improves lipid metabolism in high-fat diet-induced-obese mice. Food Chem Toxicol 2010; 48(3): 937-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.01.003.
  11. Meng S, Cao J, Feng Q, Peng J, Hu Y. Roles of Chlorogenic Acid on Regulating Glucose and Lipids Metabolism: A Review. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013; 2013: 801457. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/801457.
  12. Santana-Gálvez J, Cisneros-Zevallos L, Jacobo-Velázquez DA. Chlorogenic Acid: Recent Advances on Its Dual Role as a Food Additive and a Nutraceutical against Metabolic Syndrome. Molecules 2017; 22(3): 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22030358.
  13. Watanabe T, Arai Y, Mitsui Y, Kusaura T, Okawa W, Kajihara Y, et al. The blood pressure-lowering effect and safety of chlorogenic acid from green coffee bean extract in essential hypertension. Clin. Exp Hypertens 2006; 28(5): 439-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641960600798655.
  14. Patti AM, Al-Rasadi K, Katsiki N, Banerjee Y, Nikolic D, Vanella L, et al. Effect of a natural supplement containing Curcuma longa, guggul, and chlorogenic acid in patients with metabolic syndrome. Angiology 2015; 66(9): 856-861. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003319714568792.
  15. Di Renzo L, Carraro A, Valente R, Iacopino L, Colica C, De Lorenzo A. Intake of red wine in different meals modulates oxidized LDL level, oxidative and inflammatory gene expression in healthy people: a randomized crossover trial. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2014; 2014: 681318. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/681318.
About the Authors: 

Vladimir I. Mizin – MD, DSc, Associate Professor, Chair of Physiotherapy Department, Academic Research Institute of Physical Methods of Treatment, Medical Climatology and Rehabilitation, Yalta, Russia. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9121-8184.
Vladimir V. Iezhov – MD, DSc, Professor, Deputy Director of Science, Academic Research Institute of Physical Methods of Treatment, Medical Climatology and Rehabilitation, Yalta, Russia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1190-967X
Leyla S. Dudchenko – MD, DSc, Chair of Pulmonology Department, Academic Research Institute of Physical Methods of Treatment, Medical Climatology and Rehabilitation, Yalta, Russia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1506-4758
Nikita A. Severin – MD, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Crimean Federal University, Yalta, Russia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4255-4496
Anatolij Ya. Yalaneckyy – Engineer, Candidate of Technology, Chair of Wine Technology Department, Russian National Research Institute of Viticulture and Wine-Making “Magarach”, Yalta, Russia. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2008-8436.

Received 27 May 2020, Revised 27 April 2021, Accepted 27 May 2021 
© 2020, Russian Open Medical Journal 
Correspondence to Vladimir I. Mizin. Address: Academic Scientific Research Institute of Physical Methods of Treatment, Medical Climatology and Rehabilitation, 10/3 Muchina str., Yalta 298613, Russia. Phone: +73654323073, +79787075330. E-mail: yaltamizin@mail.ru.

DOI: 
10.15275/rusomj.2021.0409